Records
Ramped coils only. A point per build: how long the winding was, against how long the arc came out, so the ratio is the slope from the origin and the dashed rays are lines of constant ratio. A coil driven in flat bangs is a different machine answering a different question, and it is not on this axis.
Pick a point. The dashed rays are constant ratio, so a build above one got more out of its coil than a build below it.
Built one? Put it up.
Post it in Build Logs with the two lengths, how it was driven, and a single-take video with something of known size in frame. That is the standard the judged wall will use, and a build that arrives with it already goes straight on.
These are not judged records
Every point above is a published build. A filled one was read at the page the builder wrote; a hollow one came out of this project's own notes on the thread, which is a good deal better than hearsay and still not the same as having opened it. None of them has been through the standard this wall will hold a claim to, which is a single-take video with a measurable reference in frame. A seeded wall that looks like a judged one is worse than an empty page, so: this is the seed, and it says which is which.
The ratios are arithmetic on the two lengths rather than figures the builders published, so any rounding in them is ours. Where a builder gave their own, it is in the note. A build whose winding length was never published has no place along the bottom axis, so it is named under the plot rather than quietly dropped from it.
That the points do not line up along a ray is the argument of what coupling actually buys. Read the safety guide before you chase length. While the wall is being built, post yours in Build Logs.